ewein2412: (e vane)
EWein2412 ([personal profile] ewein2412) wrote2010-08-27 02:38 pm
Entry tags:

my reputation precedes me.

I am listed under "Authors Who Support FanFic About Their Work"... FWIW

http://fanlore.org/wiki/Professional_Author_Fanfic_Policies

[identity profile] lauradi7.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 01:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I find it interesting that JK Rowling is OK with fanfic, but came down HARD on the guy that made the HP encyclopedia or whatever it was. Presumably she's making the Gaiman distinction, of non-profit vs profit.

[identity profile] tiboribi.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I love Diana Wynne Jones and Michael Chabon's attitudes. They delight me. Even if Chabon is a bit full of himself, citing Virgil (which is part of why I love it).

How can Jaspar Fforde be opposed to fanfic?

[identity profile] tiboribi.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 02:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, Doyle's is pretty great too. I also really love the Leverage guy's line about basically just finding the idea of fan fiction to be flattering.

Jaspar Fforde is totally fanfic. I wonder if he also objects to Jane Eyre fanfic, given that he used it. Maybe he objects because he's worried people might write better stories in his world than he does. (I like his world a lot.)

[identity profile] tiboribi.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 03:10 pm (UTC)(link)
He appears to be in favor of it. Apparently, especially if someone writes fanfiction about him.
3rdragon: (Default)

[personal profile] 3rdragon 2010-08-27 03:20 pm (UTC)(link)
How can Jaspar Fforde be opposed to fanfic?

That is exactly what my friend [livejournal.com profile] chocochan said when she heard that he doesn't approve of fanfic. How does he managed that, anyway? Is it not fanfic if the book in question is a classic? Or if the author is dead and there's not really a copyright holder anymore?

[identity profile] lnbw.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 04:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I would not be surprised if there's a whole lot of people who don't consider something "fanfic" if it's based on a classic. See also Jane Austen sequels, Gone with the Wind sequels, etc.

There are also at least two authors on the list of authors who disapprove of fanfiction who have written fairy tale retellings, which is at least a different degree of the same thing (Orson Scott Card's Enchantment and Robin McKinley's... well, almost everything, but we'll start with The Outlaws of Sherwood and Beauty and Deerskin and...).
3rdragon: (Default)

[personal profile] 3rdragon 2010-08-27 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I can see writing retellings but not supporting fanfic if it's a character issue. Most fairy tale people don't have much in terms of personality.

That still doesn't excuse the classics-means-it's-not-fanfic people, though.

[identity profile] mhari.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 05:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I see they didn't mention the part where you get all squeeful and adorable about it. :D

[identity profile] mhari.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
was it? I can't remember.

[identity profile] mhari.livejournal.com 2010-08-28 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)
it is true I am a giant Turunesh fangirl.

[identity profile] mhari.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
A lady has to have some secrets!

[identity profile] rainbowjehan.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Good to know, considering I've... already written the stuff. >_>

[identity profile] marguerlucy.livejournal.com 2010-08-28 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
Someone tell Gabaldon to get over herself - people have been fanfic-ing sexy men in kilts long before she made them time travel ;-)

As many of the authors who support fanfic said, it's a major compliment to an author's character work when their work inspires fan fiction, and as long as no one is selling it or claiming the characters as their own, what harm is there?